Is anyone running buster/sid on armel? if so does current udev work?

[peter green]

It has recently been discovered in raspbian ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/raspbian/+bug/1793415 ) that udev doesn't start if built with gcc 8 due to what appears to be a hardening related failure. As a result I have just forced the systemd source package (which builds udev) in raspbian to build with gcc-7.

This issue does not appear to affect Debian armhf.

Which leaves me wondering about armel, has anyone tried udev 239-8 or 239-9 on armel? if so did it work?

[Rogério Brito]

Hi, Peter and others.

Post by peter green
It has recently been discovered in raspbian (
https://bugs.launchpad.net/raspbian/+bug/1793415 ) that udev doesn't
start if built with gcc 8 due to what appears to be a hardening related
failure. As a result I have just forced the systemd source package
(which builds udev) in raspbian to build with gcc-7.
This issue does not appear to affect Debian armhf.
Which leaves me wondering about armel, has anyone tried udev 239-8 or
239-9 on armel? if so did it work?

I'm running testing (buster) on armel here with udev/systemd 239-9 and
everything works well with the KuroBox Pro (with 128MB of RAM).


Regards,

Rogério Brito.